Please forgive a bit of self-promotion here. Oh, and disclaimer: Shrout Research and PC Perspective share government and ownership.
Based on contrast finished by Shrout Research and published in a paper this week, a introduction of Android applications on Chromebooks directly yet a Play Store has combined a new fold into a height preference decision. Android applications, distinct Chromebook local apps, have a complicated weight towards a Android phone and inscription ecosystem, with “defacto” optimization for a ARM-based processors and platforms that paint 98%+ of that market. As a result, there are some conspicuous and noteworthy differences when regulating Android apps on Chromebooks powered by an ARM SoC and an Intel x86 SoC.
With that marketplace prevalence as common knowledge, all Android applications are grown targeting ARM hardware, for ARM processors. Compilers and opening profiling program has been built and polished to urge a knowledge and potency of apps to run on ARMv7 (32-bit) and ARMv8 (64-bit) architectures. This brings to a consumer an softened altogether experience, including improved focus harmony and improved performance.
Using a span of Acer Chromebooks, a R11 formed on a Intel Celeron N3060 and a R13 formed on a MediaTek MT8173C, contrast was finished to review a performance, loading times, and altogether fortitude of several Android Play Store applications. A operation of focus categories were addressed including games, social, and productivity.
Through 19 tested Android apps we found that a ARM-powered R13 Chromebook achieved improved than a Intel-powered R11 Chromebook in 9 of them. In 8 of a apps tested, both platforms achieved equally well. In 2 of a exam applications, a Intel-powered complement achieved improved (Snapchat and Google Maps).
The paper also touches on energy consumption, and between these dual systems, a ARM-based MediaTek SoC was regulating 11.5% reduction energy to accomplish a same tasks.
Our contrast indicates a Acer R13, regulating a ARM-powered processor, uses 11.5% reduction energy on normal in a 150 mins of use by a preparation simulation. This is a poignant domain and would prove that with dual systems equally configured, one with a MediaTek ARM processor and another with a Intel Celeron processor, a ARM-powered height would get 11.5% additional use time before requiring a charge. Based on standard Chromebook battery life (11 hours), a ARM complement would see an additional 75 mins of usability.
There is a lot some-more fact in the white paper on ShroutResearch.com, including a contention about a impact that a further of Android applications on Chromebooks competence have for a marketplace as whole:
…bringing a immeasurable library of applications from a intelligent phone marketplace to a Chromebook would emanate a multiple of capabilities that would spin a computing spectrum sideways. This pierce alleviates a postulated idea that Chromebooks are connected-only inclination and gives an present collection of serviceable offline applications and collection to a market.